Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Glowacki


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 19:27, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Mike Glowacki

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Seems to fail WP:GNG and WP:COMPOSER. I could find nothing through the usual Google searches, though this is indicative rather than probative. The article itself makes no specific claim to notability: being a music director at a small parish church doesn't meet the criteria set out in WP:MUSBIO and owning a small non-notable business doesn't meet the criteria in WP:BIO. That leaves the album, but the only relevant results I could find, 1 and 2, are on the subject's own web sites. The references given in the article are all user-generated and directly associated with the subject. (I should declare that I previously declined this article at AfC on the grounds that the subject hadn't been shown to be notable). Alexrexpvt (talk) 17:08, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is a resource used around the world and I personally will always look to wikipedia for information. The article regarding Mike Glowacki is well written and informative. It provides factual information and there is no harm in keeping the article on wikipedia. While I appreciate your process for reviewing articles, I would not like to see this article deleted.  As more information and resources become available, they will be added to the article to build the article's credibility.  Thank you for your time and consideration and for giving others a great resource for information. 75.34.53.231 (talk) 14:27, 6 January 2013 (UTC)Annamarie
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:41, 6 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - I curious as to how this made it through AFC given that none of the sourcing in the article uses a reliable source. The subject does not meet our inclusion citieria in general, or that specific to musicians.  I was unable to find any coverage in independent reliable sources about the subject, nor have reliable sources taken any notice of his one recorded CD. -- Whpq (talk) 17:58, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:42, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran  ( t  •  c ) 01:40, 20 January 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.