Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Henry (political strategist)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 23:06, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Mike Henry (political strategist)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Run-of-the-mill political staffer fails WP:GNG. KidAd  talk  20:34, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  21:14, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  21:14, 22 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete. Being chief of staff to a senator is not an automatic notability freebie that guarantees a Wikipedia article — it can get a person in the door if they can be shown to clear WP:GNG on their sourceability, but is not an instant free notability pass just because the person exists. But the footnotes here aren't enough to make him permanently notable for this: one of them just goes to a (deadlinked) directory of all of its author's content on her employer's website, and not to any individual piece that might have spoken to Henry's potential notability; two are stacked onto a single incident that would just make him a WP:BLP1E at best; and the only one left is a simple employment announcement blurb of the type that thousands of people in politics can show without qualifying for a Wikipedia article just because of the existence of an employment announcement blurb. Bearcat (talk) 16:43, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak keep - he was chief of staff to a Vice-Presidential candidate; I'm not sure that is enough. Bearian (talk) 19:57, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG, and doesn't meet WP:NPOL.  Onel 5969  TT me 14:15, 29 December 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.