Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Hill (activist)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:28, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Mike Hill (activist)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I have some pretty serious doubts about whether this passes either WP:GNG or WP:BLP1E. There seems to be essentially zero coverage of him for anything other than dying. Even then, it's the most passing of mentions (e.g.,, ). At first glance it looks nice to have some big names in the reference section, but when you look at something like The Guardian, they actually give him exactly half a sentence, and themselves have nothing to link back to other than a niche wiki. From what I can tell, the sources in the article are pretty much the sources that are out there. G M G talk  13:13, 23 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete Non-notable person that doesn't meet WP:GNG. Even with the few mentioned sources, it is not enough to have an independent page as of now. Mredidiongekong (talk) 13:29, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - Weak sourcing that mostly focuses on the death of a non-notable person. -- Scjessey (talk) 13:34, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 14:40, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 14:40, 23 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete fails WP:SIGCOV, fails WP:BASIC.E.M.Gregory (talk) 12:41, 30 April 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.