Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Inman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 07:51, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

Mike Inman
This was originally nominated as a non-notable biography speedy deletion candidate by User:Dr Debug, but I think that there are assertions of notability in this article that required it to be listed on AfD. That said, a Google search for this person doesn't seem to come up with as many relevant hits as you'd expect from a truly notable executive, but that isn't proof-positive of anything. I'll leave a note on the talk page of User:Dr Debug so he/she can more fully explain the reasons he/she thought it should be deleted. —Cleared as filed. 15:01, 4 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete. I marked it for speedy because it appears to be an advertisement written by the author himself with many catch phrases like "Fortune 500" but he has been a Director of General Purchasing which is non-notable. It's definitely a vanity article written by the author himself. Dr Debug (Talk) 15:10, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable enough; CEO maybe, but purchasing? --Mgreenbe 16:54, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
 * delete, as per Mgreenbe. --Austrian 18:05, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
 * After reserving my judgment initially, I've re-read the article and the changes that User:Mikeyi (who I assume is Mike Inman himself) has made, and I've done some more searching, and I think this is a non-notable article from a guy who'd like to post his résumé. I recommend delete, not userfy, because Wikipedia isn't a place for this detailed a résumé. —Cleared as filed. 18:29, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Cleared as filed.. Mike should try Monster or CareerBuilder if he's trying to get a job, not Wikipedia.  --Kinu 18:45, 4 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.