Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Larkin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:28, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

Mike Larkin

 * – ( View AfD View log )

meets no notability guidelines perWP:Notability (athletes) EJBH (talk) 23:15, 12 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. EJBH (talk) 23:15, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Golf-related deletion discussions. EJBH (talk) 23:15, 12 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Gnews hits on "Mike Larkin" + "golf" are mostly unrelated to him. The few that apply are trivial--his most newsworthy achievement seems to have been once playing a round in an an amateur event with a 15-year-old Michelle Wie. General search is more of same, plus some primary and social media hits. The article itself does provide some references, e.g., his scorecard from a Hooters Tour event and a results sheet indicating that he once won $1,060.71 by tying for 17th-23rd place at the PGA Assistant Professional Championship. I note that none of the past 15 winners of this event merits a WP entry. He might yet make it to the PGA, so perhaps an article will eventually be appropriate. But fails WP:GNG for now. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 03:06, 13 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - not notable. Tewapack (talk) 18:41, 14 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete- Agreed. Not notable- William 19:43, 14 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - fails WP:GNG. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:09, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.