Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Leeder


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Black Kite (talk) 09:51, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Mike Leeder

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

As there is nothing in google to hint his notability as well that Wikipedia is not a resume, therefore this person is not notable, which explains my nomination for deletion. Donnie Park (talk) 15:43, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep: I did find plenty of references for him in google search. IMBd and this, this, this all on only first page of search. Seems notable enough to me, I don't understand your rational for nomination. The article does need cleanup though. Samar   ( Talk  .  Contributions ) 17:47, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Okay, I will be happy to pull it but not in this current form. Donnie Park (talk) 19:52, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:37, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:37, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Well ask for the creator if he/she wishes to clean it up. Otherwise request for help from someone in WikiProject Films. If I find time I will try to fix a few things. Samar   ( Talk  .  Contributions ) 08:05, 11 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 20:49, 17 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete I could not find significant coverage from multiple independent reliable sources.
 * The impactonline mention does not count toward notability as Leeder is a contributor, and so it's not independent.
 * His own web site doesn't count.
 * The IMDB entry is anonymous-submitted, and see both Notability_(films) and Notability_(people). IMDB isn't acceptable to establish the notability for films or actors, and by extension other industry figures as well
 * HK Cinemagic is a fan forum and message board and probably fails WP:SELFPUB, maybe... Like IMDB, the site itself is notable enough for a Wikpedia entry:  Hong Kong Cinemagic, but even so, the site looks comparable to IMDB, and like IMDB, has low standards for inclusion (looks to have over 20,000 entries for people by now) and as such an entry on the site is probably not useful to establish notability toward WP:GNG.
 * The one source that might contribute toward WP:GNG is the interview at fareastfilms. It's in-depth, but the site fareastfilms.com is basically a fan site.  It might contribute to notability within the sub-genre of figures in the Asian film world... someone who does a lot of Wikipedia editing in this area would have to chime in.  And besides, it's the only semi-legit looking source, and we generally require multiple sources to establish notability.
 * Other searching did not turn up any significant coverage from independent reliable sources. Unless there are special notability rules for a figure in this subject area, the individual does not appear to meet WP:GNG.    20:31, 18 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete lots of database entries and some passing references, but no deoth of coverage. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:16, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.