Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Lipe


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. —Tom Morris (talk) 10:30, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Mike Lipe

 * – ( View AfD View log )


 * Delete WP:BIO -Aaron Booth (talk) 22:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment WP:BIO isn't a reason for deletion. Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 00:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Response Actually it is "The topic of an article should be notable, or "worthy of notice"; that is, "significant, interesting, or unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded". Notable in the sense of being "famous", or "popular"—although not irrelevant—is secondary."
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:00, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:01, 27 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep He seems to have some coverage in guitar-related press. We don't have official notability guidelines for guitar luthiers, but he seems close to the top of his profession and he or his company appear "significant", "interesting" and/or "unusual". --Colapeninsula (talk) 13:54, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete I tried a Google news search on this person typing "mike lipe guitar" but I couldn't find any reliable sources. This means that he doesn't pass the notability guideline and therefore that's the reason why I think it should be deleted.  Minima  ©  ( talk ) 06:50, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B  music  ian  03:42, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, v/r - TP 01:33, 14 March 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.