Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike McGlaflin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:24, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Mike McGlaflin

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication of notability, no coverage in reliable sources beyond a passing mention in an article on his wife, not a single Google News hit. Huon (talk) 21:18, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 21:47, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 21:47, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:44, 3 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 16:49, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 03:41, 18 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete -- Not notable enough. It says he is "best known" for his work with Yves Saint Laurent, but Google searching for his name and Yves Saint Laurent just leads me back to the Wikipedia article. Jjcleary (talk) 08:10, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. He has "worked with Vuitton and St Laurent", yet searches for his surname with Vuitton/Laurent pull up next to nothing? And I do mean next to NOTHING. I'm going to say exactly what I think of this article - and that's that it is all one big fat hoax. Even "his site" is just a picture of shoes and some password-protected pages - it may not even be HIS site, all it shows is the word "McGlaflin". Article created by single purpose editor. Mabalu (talk) 16:26, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. Agree with nominator's assessment. A single purpose account would indicate that it is an attempt at self promotion. Finnegas (talk) 18:01, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.