Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Morgan (meteorologist)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to KFOR-TV. Rlendog (talk) 14:43, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Mike Morgan (meteorologist)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Non notable; fails WP:BIO. Google search failed to yield coverage in multiple independent, reliable sources. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 23:14, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep based on the sourced statements in the "career" section. Chutznik (talk) 23:28, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
 * That seems like WP:BLP1E. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 23:41, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I would have nominated Gary England and Rick Mitchell right along with this one except for Gary has won Emmy awards and Rick Mitchell is only a redirect. Ks0stm  (T•C•G•E) 23:47, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:57, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:57, 20 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Only notable for one event and not much else.  Mr. C.C. Hey yo!I didn't do it! 22:13, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 26 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Weak keep. I acknowledge Hammer's point about WP:BLP1E, but Morgan has been around for a long time and has made enough of a reputation that I think the article ought to be kept.  Here's a 2011 photojournalism piece at MSNBC that starts off, "KFOR weatherman Mike Morgan is a rock star when it comes to tracking tornadoes." --Arxiloxos (talk) 02:56, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Weak keep or Redirect. If more sources could be found which I'm sure they could to show notably I would say keep if not then redirect it to KFOR-TV which is were he works.-- Dch eagle  04:11, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect to KFOR-TV without prejudice to reversion if sufficient notability is demonstrated. - Jorgath (talk) (contribs) 18:13, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Nominator comment: I would not be opposed to the article being redirected to KFOR-TV, but I'm still of the opinion that the subject lacks notability. Ks0stm  (T•C•G•E) 20:25, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect to the station. Individual newsmen are very common, and it's not surprising he'd be mentioned at least once, but that doesn't mean there's notability. Shadowjams (talk) 22:19, 29 April 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.