Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Nazzaro


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. — G FOLEY   F OUR  — 02:09, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Mike Nazzaro

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable individual lacking ghits and gnews of substance. Fails WP:BIO.  ttonyb (talk) 00:25, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:12, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:12, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Only notability claim is winning some kind of recognition from a magazine.  Too weak to meet guidelines.--v/r - TP 03:14, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
 * (hang on)  Prominent promotion executive Has met guidelines by  work (a) has become a significant monument (Promoting Taylor Swift -instrumental in breaking the careers of Top40 artists Taylor Swift, Amy Winehouse, Colbie Caillat, Jay Sean, Kevin Rudolf, Hinder and Owl City selling over 50 million digital downloads combined. Nazzaro's achievements at Universal included promoting Taylor Swift's single "You Belong With Me", which on October 13, 2009 became the first country crossover No. 1 at Pop Radio since the radio airplay list adopted Nielsen BDS-monitored data in 1990. Also has won industry honor as listed in wiki (The person has received a well-known and significant award or honor).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Musicnewyork (talk • contribs) 18:42, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I'd dispute that an award from FMQB is a "well-known and significant award". Secondly, notability is not inherited. A good example of a "well-known and significant award" are the Grammy Awards. I've removed the, as this is an article for deletion, not a proposed deletion; I'd encourage reviewing WP:AFDEQ, WP:GD, and WP:ATA. tedder (talk) 18:56, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 07:39, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per my above comment, fails WP:BIO with the sources given. tedder (talk) 22:09, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.