Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike O'Toole


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. ‑Scottywong | confess _ 16:49, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Mike O'Toole

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Just passing this along after declining a PROD since there have been at least three of them over the history of this article. Primary concern relevant to AfD seem to be that the subject does not meet notability guidelines. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 23:44, 18 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - I can't see any way (most of) the references in that list could possibly be considered to be from reliable sources - broken links, event directories, Flikr and self-published videos. The one actual news item in the list is about the subject's product (the community television program he is on) rather than the subject. Even then, we need multiple sources, so one falls short. Can't see any way the subject currently meets WP:GNG. Stalwart 111  (talk) 02:29, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:27, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:27, 19 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete nothing in google news related to him or google books. As per above, the only links here are youtube and online directories. SalHamton (talk) 01:18, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete: Looked all around, no indication that he's had significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. His coverage in the Boston Globe article cited in the article consists of a half-sentence mention in the caption of a picture in which he does not appear. Fails WP:GNG, WP:CREATIVE. --Batard0 (talk) 13:21, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete No significant third-party coverage. OhNo itsJamie Talk 16:02, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.