Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Richard (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Jaranda wat's sup 01:45, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Mike Richard (second nomination)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable biography per WP:BIO. An article with this title was previously deleted as a result of an AfD discussion here, but " " failed because apparently it was not the same person (see this). RJASE1 15:56, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep if sources confirming Mike Richard was the first to have this procedure are provided by the end of the debate. In that case he is no less deserving of an article than Louis Washkansky. However, if this proof isn't forthcoming then Delete. Nuttah68 16:05, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable, no sources. Nardman1 16:07, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete unless sourced and referenced i.a.w. WP:BIO and WP:V by end of this AfD —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Alf photoman (talk • contribs) 17:25, 11 February 2007 (UTC).
 * Comment - I should have mentioned in the original nom that the article seems autobiographical in nature, in violation of WP:OR and WP:COI (the business mentions in particular). RJASE1 18:08, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, first patient of one particular type of heart-lung machine does not seem particularly notable. --Dhartung | Talk 05:06, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment ECMO is/was a new medical technique, not just a different brand of machine. Nuttah68 17:55, 12 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.