Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Slocombe (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. X clamation point  03:29, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Mike Slocombe
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete this was deleted three years ago and now its back in another form. Was tagged speedy, but I'll bring it here. Still seems to be nn per WP:BIO. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 21:00, 11 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete lack of cites not directly from Urban75. Agree that it's not a speedy; some concern that versions of the article have been an attempt to push a lot of unsubstantiated pov as well -- Blue Square Thing (talk) 22:32, 11 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep Given the fame of Mike Slocombe, including one of the UK's top photographys, technology review and most influtenial person in the UK web industry. FatGary5436 (talk) 23:23, 11 March 2009 (UTC) — FatGary5436 (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Delete unless further notability can be established Vartanza (talk) 05:04, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, the sources don't constitute "significant coverage". TrulyBlue (talk) 10:32, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep   The OJR article from USC Annenberg is sufficient as a source. A full featured article, and the comments about him there are sufficient. The book adds to it.    DGG (talk) 00:35, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Whilst I've heard of Mike (and indeed remember him from back on news:uk.misc) I don't see enough to satisfy WP:BIO Mayalld (talk) 08:07, 13 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.