Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Tannura


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit  11:59, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

Mike Tannura

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I looked through the links on the notability find sources thing, and found one passing mention in a Guardian article, a few passing mentions in Google Books as far as I could tell, none from the newspapers link, none from JSTOR, and some papers he wrote in Google Scholar. I'm not too used to this area, but it seems like an article that does not have enough secondary sources to include on Wikipedia. The two sources in the article appear to be primary. Skarmory  (talk •   contribs)  11:34, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2022 January 6.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 11:49, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete At best only one of the sources meets GNG, and I am not sure that is the case, but since GNG requires multiple sources we are not meeting it here.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:21, 6 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.