Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Woods (meteorologist)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 12:35, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

Mike Woods (meteorologist)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

nothing points to why he is a notable weatherman Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 05:58, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete No sources and reads like a resume. I'm glad he's doing well in his career but nothing of interest to the rest of us that needs an encyclopedia article. Jaque Hammer (talk) 14:51, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete agreed. Career builder is a more appropriate website. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Meritstarzzz (talk • contribs) 15:16, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. I agree, as well - there's little evidence of notability. That said, if he becomes notable in some fashion, an article might be in order - but there's nothing to suggest that we're anywhere near that, yet. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 14:17, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:29, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:29, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.