Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike deSeve


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 04:22, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Mike deSeve

 * - (View AfD) (View log)

Clearly a coat rack article. From the links to this page it seems obvious that Mike deSeve is a pseudonym of Mike Judge, yet the article treats deSeve as a real and distinct person, only to ignore the said person to discuss the March of One Thousand Coffins. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rkeast (talk • contribs) 2010/08/14 11:44:50
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 11:42, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:41, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:41, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. I'm thinking a short trim and a merge would do well here, just not sure to where. -- &oelig; &trade; 10:45, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Second relist rationale. The article is a BLP. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete He's pulled a few stunts and achieved some degree of media coverage, and IMDB gives him a somewhat substantive resume. However, searching under "Mike de Seve" and "Mike deSeve" both failed to turn up more than token news coverage, i.e. no significant coverage of the subject or his work, failing WP:CREATIVE, and not enough coverage of him to pass the GNG. Ray  Talk 04:38, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.