Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike doren


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. –  Rob e  rt  T 00:58, 29 November 2005 (UTC)

Mike doren
Almost identical to a (now deleted) Mike Doren article, maybe even speedy delete.Ronabop 07:03, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
 * This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. &mdash;Crypticbot (operator) 15:51, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete, previously deleted material. RasputinAXP   T   C  18:56, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Mike Doren was speedied as an nnbio. This version asserts notability in the last section. &mdash;Cryptic (talk) 19:14, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
 * And here's that assertion, for those who enjoy verifying this stuff (AndyJones 21:05, 23 November 2005 (UTC)):
 * During this period of 3 years, the Auxiliary Priests produced 3 albums, 2 of which were multiplatinum, one which was only platinum. It was during this time that their highest selling single, "Ol' Mucky Terrahawks", was produced.


 * Upon closer inspection it sounds more like a SD for Nonsense. Ol Mucky Terrahawks is a name given by a Wu-Tang Name Generator. I stand by my Speedy. RasputinAXP   T   C  21:32, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete an obvious prank. Durova 07:09, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete 'Auxiliary Priests' does not show up in CDnow, and yet they went multiplatinum? Jasmol 17:47, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
 * I moved this unsigned anonymous comment by User:152.163.101.12 from the talk page (AndyJones 23:48, 24 November 2005 (UTC)):
 * Please do not delete this article. This is actually the truth about Mike Doren and their band. While the name Ol' Mucky Terrahawks was from the name generator, they liked the name which was presents, that being the aforementioned Ol' Mucky Terrahawks. This is entirely legitimate.
 * And now I'm reverting a (probably vandalism) blanking of this AfD.AndyJones 21:19, 25 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.