Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike mika


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Babajobu 21:30, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

Mike mika
Non-notable vanity biography of a bipedal mammal. Delete &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-01-25 08:20Z  To clarify, I believe this is an article about a real person, and am nominating to delete it as a non-notable biography; I don't think it is complete bollocks. The "bipedal mammal" statement is cute but informationless vanity. &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-01-27 22:26Z 
 * Delete, is this an advertisement about a company or their company motto?Jawz 08:34, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete this mammal, perhaps BJAORN. Grandmasterka 08:47, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Terence Ong 11:21, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- Nacon Kantari  e |t||c|m 20:21, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Latinus 20:27, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and WP:BALLS. Stifle 14:33, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete nnb. -HiFiGuy 08:11, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
 * He's the head of the largest studio of the largest independet videogame company in the US. He's written million plus selling games, and made substantial contributions to the craft of games. The bio is pretty short, but it is not innaccurate.
 * Comment: I did a little bit of research on this one, and it seems like Mr. Mika and Backbone Entertainment are very much on the way up. However, this guy is the head of a studio of a division of a company who's own page kind of admits that it's far from the biggest thing in video games. (I'm a moderate fan of video games and I'd never heard of "Foundation 9 Entertainment".) So until this guy has more direct and verifiable accomplishments until his belt (which he undoubtedly will) I still think this article should be deleted. Grandmasterka 08:49, 30 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.