Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mikemon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was MERGE to somewhere. WP:DIGI need to be regularly poked and prodded until they work out where; there are no eternal get-out clauses. -Splash - tk 23:40, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Mikemon
This character appears to be a very minor fictional character if anything (google gives 548 hits). Unless its going to be merged with a larger list, I don't see how this is anywhere near notable enough to include into wikipedia. I appreciate that there are some people who edit wikipedia who are very fond of the digimon series... but that doesn't change its relevance, and it should follow the guidelines of all fiction here: minor characters don't get their own page. Monk of the highest order 03:01, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Very weak keep The character isn't particularly notable, but deleting this page, while leaving in place the other hundreds of Digimon linked to from List of Digimon, seems like the wrong remedy.  Probably, the best thing to do would be to create something like Minor Digimon Characters and merge a bunch of them into that single article.  I'm not volunteering for that.  --Hyperbole 03:08, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, 548 goggle hits is so little for a digimon Jaranda wat's sup 03:20, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete and clear out most of the articles on the list of Digimon. Are most of these Digimon articles more notable than some random Pokémon? No, no they aren't. --- RockMFR 03:36, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment We have so many articles on random Pokémon that List of Pokémon is actually a disambiguation page, and List of Pokémon by name lists what appears to be hundreds of articles on Pokémon. I'm not sure who decided that all this information was notable - it certainly wasn't me - but I do think we should consider precedent.  --Hyperbole 03:56, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment The Pokemon test is not "precedent". Pokemon species tend to be verified.  I don't see any sources in here.  ColourBurst 07:44, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Let's not get into a Chewbacca debate about Pokémon. Consensus among the editors who actually care about Digimon is to merge this somewhere relevant; it's just still a matter of debate where and how, that's all. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 07:47, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge this and all other miscellaneous random Digimon to a single article, as suggested by Hyperbole. (I'm not volunteering either.) In fact, do that to Pokemon too. Maybe a bit of windmill-tilting but this is rank fancruft and exactly the kind of article we don't need. Opabinia regalis 04:24, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep pending mass merge Ironically WikiProject Digimon is well ahead of you guys on this. If anyone bothered to look at the talk page they would have seen a notice that says that all the articles are currently undergoing a major reorganization and mass merge. (Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Digimon Systems Update/Article reorganization) Basically, we agree, and are currently in the process of sorting out a few hundred articles as well as figuring out what is notable and what isn't. We should keep this article for the duration of the mass article reorganization, as it will be taken care of then. -- Ned Scott 06:02, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep pending an already-planned merge. WP:DIGI is already cleaning this up. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 06:07, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep and Merge--Eldarone 06:44, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep for them to do the mass merge. - Lex 09:03, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions.   -- Zinirt 11:34, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep pending WP:DIGI merge. --- RockMFR 12:35, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep and allow WP:DIGI to do its damn work. --Kitch (Talk : Contrib) 15:13, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: We can take care of this without your bad attitude. Indiawilliams 18:53, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and Merge as long as WP:DIGI is planning to merge it into an umbrella article. ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjo e  23:16, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.