Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mikhail Belzer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Arbitrarily0  ( talk ) 04:27, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

Mikhail Belzer

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Insufficient sourcing to establish notability. First link in article may be a significant coverage by a reliable source but others does not pass WP:SIGCOV. Alimovvarsu (talk) 17:53, 10 November 2022 (UTC) (sock strike Liz Read! Talk! 07:11, 14 November 2022 (UTC))
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople,  and Russia. Alimovvarsu (talk) 17:53, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not LinkedIn. Mccapra (talk) 20:36, 10 November 2022 (UTC)


 * • Keep He is notable person. Worked as CEO in multiple notable corporations such as Uralmash. He contributed in international projects as well as to the business environment.  Blogleads (talk) 05:31, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Please provide sufficient sources and evidence for your claim. Merely serving in notable companies cannot be a reason for notability. Alimovvarsu (talk) 19:14, 11 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete. The sourcing here is weak, mostly consisting of primary sources. The first source is written by the subject and the others only have brief mentions of the subject or are press releases. Cannot find any reliable sources that discuss the subject in depth. gobonobo  + c 16:22, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete his achievements are hardly noteworthy and lacks in-depth coverage to meet WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 08:11, 15 November 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.