Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mikhail Volkenshtein


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Keep.  (aeropagitica)  21:28, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Mikhail Volkenshtein
Primary contributor has a history of contributing shady data to Wikipedia... Folajimi 05:32, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and clean up and/or verify as necessary. "The article content is suspect" is not a valid criterion for AFD. Microtonal 05:33, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
 * I would gladly support your vote, as soon as you can prove that "Quantum Biophysics" is a valid field of study. (To avoid duplication, I would encourage you to follow the discussion regarding the Revaz Dogonadze article.)
 * Cheers. Folajimi 05:45, 7 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep, this nomination is not much different from the Revaz Dogonadze one. Roy  boy cr ash  fan  [[Image:Flag_of_Texas.svg|30px]] 05:46, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, a google search for M. E. Volkenshtein turns up enough to verify the important parts of the article's contents, and he seems to meet WP:BIO. --Aquillion 10:06, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, meets WP:BIO. --Ter e nce Ong 11:49, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment meets WP:BIO if any of it is actually true. I couldn't WP:V it so I'd suggest a source and verifiable tag on the article.--Isotope23 17:18, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notable. Staxringold 23:47, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.