Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miko Lee


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 00:03, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Miko Lee

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No significant coverage and doesn't pass WP:PORNBIO. Epbr123 (talk) 07:32, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Morbidthoughts (talk) 21:16, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - one nomination in her finished career does not pass WP:PORNBIO. Morbidthoughts (talk) 21:16, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't think her career is finished. She just recently appeared in Fornic-Asian which was made in 2009. PowaaMan (talk) 03:54, 31 August 2009 (UTC)]
 * It's an old scene that was originally released in Red Dragon. She has been retired for several years. Morbidthoughts (talk) 22:53, 1 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep - It's true that she doesn't pass technically WP:PORNBIO, yet she appeared in several award-winning pornographic movies (see this for an example, but if you look at linking pages you find others). This means that she passes WP:ENT ("Has had significant roles in multiple commercially produced or significant films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions"), of which WP:PORNBIO is just a subcategory. --Cyclopia (talk) 21:31, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Based on your example, which Ass Worship was she in? Morbidthoughts (talk) 14:18, 27 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. Fails WP:PORNBIO, no other claim to notability. Language from WP:ENT quoted by keep !voter is recent nonconsensus change that was not intended to relax (or in any way effect) the notability standards for porn performers; specific consensus rejected the idea that notability could be inferred from the number of pornographic projects a performer appeared in. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 17:31, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
 * May I have a link to consensus discussion? It should be worth to put into the policy. Anyway it seems a bit odd that the number of award-winning movies a performed appeared has no weight on notability; does WP list only award-winning non-pornographic actors? --Cyclopia (talk) 19:39, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
 * If she has appeared in multiple award-winning adult movies, then she probably does pass the consensus version of WP:ENT: "Has had significant roles in multiple notable films". But what are the award-winning movies she's been in? Epbr123 (talk) 14:46, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I am looking for the award-winning movies. Anyway WP:ENT says "Has had significant roles in multiple commercially produced or significant films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions.", which for Miko Lee is obviously true (check the huge list on IMDB). If this is non-consensus, why is that featured on the page? I am confused. --Cyclopia (talk) 11:12, 31 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. She fails WP:PORNBIO. BTW, appearing in a film, award winning or not, doesn't mean it was a significant role. Niteshift36 (talk) 05:17, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The IAFD link shows her roles in many of the films. --Cyclopia (talk) 07:32, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
 * yes, it shows films she was in. Doesn't show the roles were significant. And to be honest, I don't really see a straight to video porn cranked out at a rate of 3 a day as significant, even if they put your name in the title. There are notable porn actresses. This isn't one of them. Niteshift36 (talk) 17:02, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
 * yes, it shows films she was in. Doesn't show the roles were significant. : If you had looked at the list a bit, you would have noticed that for ~50% of the film it specifies the kind of sex scene she was involved in. Since an hardcore porn film is almost all made of sex scenes, it comes by definition that she had a significant role in each of those films. You can see the films yourself just to be sure :)
 * And to be honest, I don't really see a straight to video porn cranked out at a rate of 3 a day as significant, even if they put your name in the title. : And to be honest, I disagree. No matter how fast & cheaply they are cranked out, they have been many, published by prestigious (if so we can say) productions, and verifiably so. There's always an arbitrary element in notability claims, but facts are that 1)she had lots of significant roles in such films (as someone below said, even if it was 10%, they would be many indeed), 2)such films have been commercially produced and distributed by top producers 3)these claims are by far and large verifiable. --Cyclopia (talk) 18:08, 1 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep as incredibly prolific actress who meets WP:ENT . 143 films in 11 years? Even if only 10% of them were significant roles... it meets ENT. When does she sleep? MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 08:42, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.