Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MikroKopter


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 00:54, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

MikroKopter

 * – ( View AfD View log )

no indication of meeting notability guidelines at WP:ORG. The references given are either not independent or do not mention the company. Disputed prod. noq (talk) 13:37, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I think the reference http://www.u-blox.com/en/press-and-events/press-release-archive/1197-mikrokopter-captures-precision-photos-and-videos-using-u-blox-gps.html is both independent and mentions the company. Paul venter (talk) 14:50, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
 * That's a press release, which is a piece of promotional material produced by the company, which the company then pays a website to host the material. Not independant. Angryapathy (talk) 15:29, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:32, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:33, 20 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment: Possible independent news source: . - The Bushranger One ping only 11:53, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 15:23, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Alpha_Quadrant    (talk)  04:51, 12 January 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.