Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miks C-Kellman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 12:33, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Miks C-Kellman

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

DePRODed by author without addressing the issue(s). Concern was: ''None of the sources are actually about Kellman. Fleeting mentions and primary sources. In fact this bio is largely promotional in tone and apart from being a kind of CV, does not demonstrate any true significance or importance to pass notability criteria for biographies.'' Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:57, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
 * The sources are about Kellman! The issue is that most of the sources available are in Latvian or local Indian languages as most of his work is produced in those languages, but it is no doubt, he has impacted the lives of million young people across Europe and India. I think it does align perfectly with the rules and regulations of the living persons bios of Wiki. The references listed are about Mr. Kellman, the interviews, the reports and news articles. Rachelberkeley (talk) 07:27, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Mmm. I agree, the article does fit the regulations of the living persons bios of Wiki. I am also working on adding new references/sources to the page. There are a lot of evident and reliable resources of Kellman online and on books. Specifically about his work within the youth sector. Veenawomen (talk) 07:28, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I have double checked the sources, all sources are mainly about Kellman and his work, therefore I disagree with the concern raised by Kudpung กุดผึ้ง. Some sources are also available in Latvian and I would propose Rachelberkeley to create a Latvian version of Kellman's page also, a lot of information/sources are in Latvian. This page is useful and should be maintained and kept.Veenawomen (talk) 13:17, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Rachelberkeley and Veenawomen are ✅ sock puppets.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:03, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete promo WP:NOT for many reasons typified by namedrop images (cf WP:NOTINHERITED). BLP sourcing is weak. Widefox ; talk 12:29, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Basically puffery. The refs are unsubstantial, just as the nominator says. I would have considered this for a G11 speedy,  DGG ( talk ) 18:16, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 06:21, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Latvia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 06:21, 5 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.