Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Milan Čokić


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep (non-admin closure). Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:17, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

Milan Čokić

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article's subject fails to meet WP:GNG. A search on GoogleNews produces no hits, a regular Google search shows pages of statistics but no substantive coverage. I have verified that there are no articles on him in either the Serbian or Serbo-Croatian Wikipedias. While he may appear to meet WP:NSPORT, he does not meet the the more-fundamental requirements of WP:GNG. KDS 4444 Talk  09:14, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep, played in the Nemzeti Bajnokság I, which is a fully professional and top level Hungarian league . It should be enough to meet our notability requirements. --Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 10:19, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:18, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:18, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:18, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:19, 30 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep - numerous appearances in a fully-professional league, as confirmed by reliable sources, so this player meets WP:NFOOTBALL. Needs improving, not deleting, to bring in line with WP:GNG. Nomination smacks of WP:POINT. GiantSnowman 17:36, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment - It was my understanding that the policies outlined in WP:NFOOTY and WP:NFOOTBALL, both under the heading of WP:NSPORTS, were only intended as useful guidelines, rules of thumb, and that WP:GNG still had to be met to justify a full article. As a relatively recent creation, this article maybe needs more time.  I am wondering, though, if it does not maybe fall into a class of articles (WP:SUBSTUBS on young footballers/ soccer players) whose good faith creation was premised on a misinterpretation of WP:NSPORTS (?). Or maybe I am the one who is misinterpreting-- in that case, please help!  KDS 4444  Talk  22:12, 30 June 2014 (UTC)


 *  Keep. Appears to meet WP:NFOOTBALL. Mice never shop (talk) 23:57, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.