Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Milan Dobrojevic


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. Hut 8.5 19:55, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Milan Dobrojevic

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

non-notable fractal artist. I am unable to locate any references asserting that he's particularly notable in his field, all that Google turns up is Flickr, Lulu.com (a big warning siren for me) and his personal websites. I would have speedied, but there is an assertion of notability in there, so here we are. Lankiveil (talk) 06:09, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete- nn article as now is fails WP:BIO no reliable sources cited.  Sting_au   Talk  06:30, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Hi, I think that this Artist need to be here. He is breaking ground in Fractal Art field. Search "fractals" google images and look at his work(011art.com), you will see the differences. Citation (Milan Dobrojevic): Fractals have been usually classified as psychedelic art, although there are plenty of them which don’t give us that kind of impression. In most of fractals you will find spirals, psychedelic colors and shapes, which are easy to make in this field - if you start to create them you will notice that most of people who create fractals are still at previously mentioned level. Actually there are only 10% of people who deeply get in this field and make new way, which presents much more than only psychedelic art. From 2005. to 2007. I have created over 6000 fractals with intention to technically improve and support new view on fractals.

Milica Milovanovic —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aboutabout (talk • contribs) 07:15, 30 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. – David Eppstein (talk) 07:23, 30 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. No evidence of notability.  RJC Talk 19:09, 30 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete not notable. the last part of the article is also strongly promotional of *future* business plans Clubmarx (talk) 03:30, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable.  freshacconci  speak to me  13:12, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Non-notable. -- David  Shankbone  19:53, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

You Can't See Your Own Eyes difference and quality? Good night! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aboutabout (talk • contribs) 04:01, 20 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.