Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Milano Fernando (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  12:37, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Milano Fernando
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Article was the subject of a previous AfD in 2016, which was rightfully kept as the article met the WP:NCRIC guidelines; however, these guidelines have since been revised and appearances in the WCL have been removed from NCRIC, meaning this cricketer no longer meets the inclusion criteria. There is little else about him to establish wider WP:GNG. StickyWicket (talk) 10:03, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. StickyWicket (talk) 10:03, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. StickyWicket (talk) 10:03, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. StickyWicket (talk) 10:03, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails the new updated cricket guidelines, and not seeing enough for a GNG pass. Not seeing a suitable redirect here either. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 10:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails both GNG and the revised NCRIC, could find no sources outside of directory listings and passing mentions in results tables. Devonian Wombat (talk) 02:28, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete fails GNG. All sports SNGs state that the subject needs to pass GNG for us to actually keep the article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:31, 8 February 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.