Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mile Davidović


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete.  (aeropagitica)  22:29, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

Mile Davidović
Entire article is an almost direct steal from the subject's own web site. Apart from being a potential copyvio, this also appears to be largely self-promotion - most of the article was written by User:Mile davidovic OpenToppedBus - Talk to the driver 15:12, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, WP:NOT an art gallery. Sandstein 16:04, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. I removed a lot of the peacock stuff a few hours ago, but going back, I'm not actually convinced any notability is asserted.  On the plus side, as the article was created by the guy himself, I'm guessing that for once, the image is legitimately GFDL.  Huzzah!    Proto    ||    type    16:25, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
 * delete nn Bucketsofg 19:24, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Apparently a moderately prominent/ubiquitous figure in the naive art field, with 30K+ Google hits (and a surprising percentage of those hits are non-trivial.) So he's bland and his appeal is lowest-common-denominator, so are way too many of the pop music subjects. Monicasdude 00:07, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Google hits, other hits are trivial (sellin' low cost pictures, forums(Linux, ...)), but you have to speak serbian language to understand whats up, not notable, self-promotion --MaNeMeBasat 07:34, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.