Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Milen Mitev


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 16:54, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Milen Mitev

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Played 2 football matches over 10 years ago at the professional level but has spent his subsequent career at amateur/semi-pro level. This cited source fails to show any significant coverage of Mitev. Likewise Google searches and a Bulgarian source search yield only coverage of a lawyer of the exact same name. In fact, the only coverage I can find of this particular Mitev is a trivial mention in Plovdiv24, which is far from WP:GNG. GNG is absolutely required when the WP:NFOOTBALL pass is so trivial. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:54, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:54, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:54, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bulgaria-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:54, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:56, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - there is longstanding consensus that scraping by on NFOOTBALL with one or two appearances is insufficient when GNG is failed so comprehensively, as is the case here. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 19:59, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. ArsenalGhanaPartey (talk) 20:07, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:GNG, a clear WP:BEFORE has been done to show this. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:26, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: I concur with the nomination. I was unable to find WP:SIGCOV for the subject. As such, in light of WP:WINNEROUTCOMES, the consensus has been deletion. GauchoDude (talk) 13:04, 19 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.