Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miles Hilton-Barber


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure)  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  01:32, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Miles Hilton-Barber

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Insufficient reliable sources; notability not established. —Swpbtalk 17:57, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - Hmmmm.... At first glance this guy has a number of stories in mainstream national new sources covering his "feats". Coverage seems more than significant enough to justify a stub. NickCT (talk) 21:34, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  05:10, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  05:10, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 06:09, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep – The subject passes WP:BASIC. Source examples:, , , , , . See also WP:BEFORE section D, and WP:NRVE, which states "The absence of citations in an article (as distinct from the non-existence of sources) does not indicate that the subject is not notable." N ORTH A MERICA 1000 19:50, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.