Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miles M.26


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 03:12, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Miles M.26

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Should have remained a re-direct, WP:GNG and the M.26 is more than adequately covered in Miles M.30}} Petebutt (talk) 09:45, 31 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Having nominated it I have revised the article considerably using a reliable reference--Petebutt (talk) 09:47, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  12:23, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  12:23, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

The way I looked at it was that the M.30 was an actual aircraft, so that article should really focus on that. But the larger project ran for the best part of a decade through several evolutions and I think it's probably beyond the scope of an article based solely on the M.30.

Perhaps it should be looked at the other way around - an article for the whole project and a section for the M.30?JN5556649 (talk) 18:06, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
 * That demotes the actually-flown type, which is a rabbit hole we shouldn't be going down - The Bushranger One ping only 22:59, 31 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep. A combination of a star to Pete (and others) for improving the article, and a minnow for not having done so before bringing the article to AfD. As expanded, the type family is clearly notable enough to stand on its own despite not being flown, squeaking past WP:GNG. - The Bushranger One ping only 22:59, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Wet minnow slapped across the face accepted--Petebutt (talk) 01:00, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Should have been a --Petebutt (talk) 22:59, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Eh, I'm feeling generous with my glorious return to the Wikipedian's Republic. ;) - The Bushranger One ping only 22:20, 2 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep - Meets WP:GNG. - Ahunt (talk) 00:41, 1 November 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.