Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miles Price


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core desat  04:53, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Miles Price

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Vanispamcruftisement, subject has questionable notability. Contested prod. MER-C 10:22, 31 March 2007 (UTC)


 * ♦Delete:  Self-serving article of little or no importance other than to the individual.Shoessss 11:12, 31 March 2007 (UTC)


 * ♦'Delete: Although outwardly appears to have sources, the only three given are his own professional profile, and two "Promised" sources that have not materialised. Vanity, not notable. Gekedo 11:15, 31 March 2007 (UTC)


 * 'Delet'e: A new user's first article (so, let's please be nice - Assume good faith), written without a complete understanding of what kinds of articles are and are not acceptable. The person this article is about does not seem to satisfy Notability (people).  -- Rick Block (talk) 15:41, 31 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete Not yet notable, no matter how well meant. I wish him every success. DGG 23:50, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Author indicates wish for deletion at the article's talk page. Maxamegalon2000 05:10, 1 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Please Delete - Miles Price is about to be placed in articles for Business First as well as in eMarketing Vox and GuruDAQ (other blogs and such will likely be chiming in) -- Miles will likely be having a third-party member from the press write the article based on sources rather than me as a family-member placing any content. Thank you -- And how is it vanity when the author isn't even the person being spoken of? (actually a family member) Don't be rude, the rest of you are very commendable. Thank you again Rick =o) -- iMarketingGuru (talk) 20:37, 03 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.