Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Milica Simić (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Keep !votes failed to adequately address WP:GNG. ✗ plicit  05:16, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

Milica Simić
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG. zoglophie 10:34, 12 December 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 08:30, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, Badminton,  and Serbia. zoglophie 10:34, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:NBADMINTON. The first criterion states "Medalist at the highest international teams or singles/doubles championships of a country", of which she appears to be a single and doubles champion of her country. You play to win the game (talk) 15:23, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
 * read FAQ #2 WP:NSPORT. zoglophie 18:19, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Delete fails WP:BIO despite an impressive streak of wins. No other coverage or notability shown Jinian (talk) 02:57, 20 December 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:34, 26 December 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 04:27, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep when i searching Milica Simić cyrillic name in google Милица Симић бадминтон, there were 369 results. ex: politika.rs, pancevo, and srbin.info. Those results are sufficient to satisfy WP:GNG. Thanks Stvbastian (talk) 08:01, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
 * I already did a WP:BEFORE on this article before nominating it for deletion and ran into these references in Serbian. There is not a stretch in these links which is close to WP:GNG. In addition, she hasn't had any international performance which (could) have contributed to much needed coverage, which is absent at the moment. zoglophie 13:36, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * <p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep per the sources presented by User:Stvbastian, which appear to satisfy GNG.  Frank  Anchor  04:52, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
 * , as per how do you personally define WP:GNG? Where is the WP:SIGCOV? <b style="color:#fffdd0">zoglophie</b> 09:47, 2 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete - when assessing whether someone is notable or not, it's pertinent to ask "Can we build a substantial biography from the sources available?" The answer in this case is "no". Politika mentions her along with a few other players. This is a routine results summary for university sport and she is never analysed in any detail. Pancevo details her winning a national championship, not sure if this is enough of an achievement for us to essentially do away with WP:GNG. The coverage in the article is weak. She is mentioned twice in the main text and once in a quote from another player. Srbin has a summary of various Universiade matches. She is mentioned 4 times altogether but it's only in the context of listing the outcomes of the matches. Nothing we can build a biography from as opposed to the stats stub that we currently have. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:53, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete along the same lines as Spiderone. The provided sources fall pretty far short of being significant coverage (mostly just passing mentions), and I haven't been able to find any sourcing myself that would satisfy notability. The NBADMINTON pass doesn't move the needle too much, either: WP:NSPORTS2022 prop. 5 requires one source with sigcov at a bare minimum, and I haven't seen anything that would clear that threshold. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 04:03, 9 January 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.