Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Milind Chittal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  10:45, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Milind Chittal

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Possible OrangeMoody recreation, appears promotional in tone. Mdann52 (talk) 20:52, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment, Promotional language can be edit out, and there are references on the web that could improve this page, but OrangeMoody problems are serious. Is there a way to find out for sure? No use improving a page that will inevitably be deleted.&mdash;Anne Delong (talk) 00:48, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment and, Is it right to permanently delete articles although they might be orangeMoody recreations?The subject of the article "Milind Chittal" is an eminent Indian vocalist and has all the credentials to be included in Wikipedia. Hence request that the page should not be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sursadhana (talk • contribs)  04:29, 14 November 2015
 * , if an article is deleted because of undisclosed paid editing, it can be recreated by a neutral editor with new text, not that which was paid for. This is assuming that there is enough information in reliable independent sources to warrant this.  If you know that the text was created by a paid editor, you should register a delete !vote and give this as a reason, because in that case the sooner this one is deleted, the sooner a fresh one can be made by an editor who is not paid, or at least admits to being paid.&mdash;Anne Delong (talk) 04:59, 14 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment and, Perhaps it was a mistake since the previous creator of the article got lured and induced into paying for the article to be published in wikipedia.However I feel that this maybe condoned atleast for once and the article be retained if "Milind Chittal" meets other criteria and standards set by wikipedia.The current article has been recreated with changes in the text compared to the previous one made, although it cannot be drastically changed.Request you once again to reconsider and restore the article before deleting. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sursadhana (talk • contribs) 08:52, 15 November 2015


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:17, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:17, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete for now as although News, Books, web searches and WP:INDAFD all found some links, there wasn't anything convincingly better. SwisterTwister   talk  05:02, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:22, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Since there has not been a clear consensus on deletion and new citations have been added to the article,the nomination for deletion may please be withdrawn and the article retained. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sursadhana (talk • contribs) 04:09, 27 November 2015
 * Actually that's not quite the case as I have to say I still think there are simply not enough in-depth third-party sources overall for an article. Additionally, an Orangemoody restarted article especially with no better improvement is taken very seriously. But as I'm not Indian, I'll notify some users who are and may have some insight for a consensus., , and . Cheers,  SwisterTwister   talk  02:10, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor Talk! 01:48, 28 November 2015 (UTC) Hello everyone,why not retain this article in the main space and withdraw the deletion nomination since an active Indian administrator has given positive feedback on the notability of this musician? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sursadhana (talk • contribs) 03:34, 6 December 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. Notable musician and has been covered by several independent and credible sources. Has been active for over three decades.  Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk)  05:52, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 10:38, 6 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.