Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Militaristic Regime Change and Militaristic Democratization


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 08:50, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Militaristic Regime Change and Militaristic Democratization
An original research essay (well, paragraph) mainly used to argue against the Iraq War, with a little historical fluff thrown in to make it sound like the term "Militaristic Democratization" is actually legit. --Wafulz 19:50, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Computerjoe 's talk 20:05, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Nlsanand 21:17, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete trolling. Gazpacho 04:19, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - wholeheartedly agree with nomination.--Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 01:30, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
 *  Rename and rewrite Delete I agree that the article is skimpy, poorly written and unsourced. However, if there isn't an article on this topic, there should be.  This article describes a major foreign policy shift of the United States and, as such, the new foreign policy approach should be documented in an NPOV way.  Whether you agree with it or not, this theory of foreign policy is of major significance to the U.S. and to the world.  If someone can provide a reference to an existing article that covers this topic, I will change my vote to Delete.
 * We have Foreign policy of the George W. Bush administration and Iraq War and National Security Strategy of the United States and Regime change. Going beyond these is extrapolation. Gazpacho 18:00, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I still think that there is a need for an article that covers this topic specifically rather than just mentioning it in the larger context of the articles mentioned by Gazpacho. However, I think it is more appropriate to delete this article and write a new one with the right name and with the quality that is expected of a Wikipedia article. --Richard 08:51, 6 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.