Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Military Families Against the War

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep. - Mailer Diablo 2 July 2005 17:27 (UTC)

Military Families Against the War
Delete. Non notable organization. Advertising. Zeimusu | (Talk page) 23:36, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)


 * Rewrite - this is a valid topic. Dunc|&#9786; 14:59, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment The present article is useless, unencyclopedic, and does not describe the organization whose website is at http://www.mfaw.org.uk . With 8000 Google hits for the exact phrase, with random samples suggesting that almost all are relevant, I think the organization is probably notable enough for an article. However, the present article is not a useful start. Keep if someone puts in a decent stub prior to expiration of VfD, otherwise Delete and make this a Requested article. This is not a vote. I intend to make an explicit vote prior to expiration of VfD. Dpbsmith (talk) 16:37, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is a copy of a poorly written press release and to me could even be a candidate for speedy delete under the criteria "Any article which consists only of attempts to correspond with the person or group named by its title."--Alabamaboy 16:43, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC) After reading a rewrite of the article, I have changed my vote to Keep. --Alabamaboy 20:13, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * I think you're right about that. Dpbsmith (talk) 19:02, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)


 * Comment: MFAW are a notable group in the UK. I am going to attempt a rewrite. Kel-nage 19:21, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep - I've done a minor rewrite, there's still plenty to be added, but I've done what I could. Could previous delete voters please reconsider their votes? Kel-nage 20:00, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep the rewrite, thanks Kel-nage. Kappa 21:20, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep - Changing my vote in my nomination (also signing) Zeimusu | (Talk page)
 * Keep. Revolución 23:47, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, after rewrite. Falphin 00:54, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep in present form, thanks Kel-nage. Dpbsmith (talk) 01:42, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete non notable organization...--GrandCru 08:08, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Clear keep. Poorly-written articles on notable entities go to cleanup, not vfd.  The current version is decent enough anyway.  Jgm 29 June 2005 04:41 (UTC)
 * Keep Badly need a rewrite/fix but the subject should hold some value --C64 29 June 2005 13:02 (UTC)


 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.