Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Militaryphotos


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 14:52, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Militaryphotos

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

A website of no objectively provable significance, subject of a lame edit war about the rules placed on its forums, entirely sourced fomr the site itself, sole external mention is a passing mention in a list of related subjects in an article on military subjects on the internet. Guy (Help!) 09:46, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Look at the edit history, there will be no resolution between the banned member and the current members. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.168.227.102 (talk • contribs) 02:32, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep I think the article should be kept if a few people are willing to spend their time, fight vandalism, and make the article a good read. Tonster 00:54, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as failing WP:WEB, no assertion of notability, no verifiable or reliable sources. The Rambling Man 10:00, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Article has become a 'bash board' for Banned mp.net members. --Bryson 16:03, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, nothing there to prove WP:N Alf Photoman  20:02, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as per CSD:A7--Vox Rationis (Talk | contribs) 20:08, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, non notable. Nardman1 02:08, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete offers nothing that passes muster against WP:WEB. Nuttah68 09:20, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, I'd like greater detail in the link between it and the History Channel? And there is also this reference that is currently in the article. There is another passing mention here. infotoday.com I'll presume there are more out there, considering the ease with which I found another one. Mathmo Talk 05:07, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as showing no assertion of notability. -- Chairman S. Talk  Contribs  06:03, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.