Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Milk fat globule membrane


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete at request of author. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:13, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Milk fat globule membrane

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Written as origional research / an essay. Appears to be potentially copy pasted from somewhere but couldn't immediately find any thing via copyvio tools. —  IVORK  Discuss 22:22, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. In the absence of any evidence that this was written by anyone other than the editor who created this we should be thanking that editor for doing such a thorough job of writing an article about a very notable topic rather than calling for deletion. This doesn't resemble in the least any of the points in WP:ESSAY. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 17:26, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment: There's no reason you can't appeal using your own account mate. And it is definitely prefered for users to only operate on one account per WP:Socking. The article has been updated since I tagged it. I feel an expert in the field will need to review this, I'll look around for a template to request that. —   IVORK  Discuss 21:50, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
 * What account? I choose to reveal my IP address when editing rather than hide behind a pseudonym. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 06:58, 7 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep A Google Scholar search shows that this is a valid topic for Wikipedia, as plenty of MEDRS-compatible sources exist. The current version relies far too heavily on primary sources, but based on what I can see, I believe fixing it is preferable to deleting it. Looie496 (talk) 23:33, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
 * keep per Looie496 rationale--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 23:46, 6 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment: It has been updated substancially since I first nominated it (origional reason was due mainly due to it looking a lot like a copy pasted essay) and does seem a lot more acceptable. Am I able to withdraw? Or have to let this AfD stay its course? —   IVORK  Discuss 00:20, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Articles_for_deletion--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 00:47, 7 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.