Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Millennium Dollar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. Hut 8.5 07:55, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Millennium Dollar

 * (View AfD)

The Millennium Dollar article is completely unreferenced, very short and unlikely to be enlarged. To me it seems like an insignificant, commercial gimmick by an insignificant, commercial company. A Google search for  gives only 707 results (160 of them being the official site ). - $\mathrm{S}$. $\mathrm{Solberg}$ $\mathrm{J}$. 17:28, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 15:21, 28 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete - As per Nom - Article is not encyclopedic. --Pmedema (talk) 16:13, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - As per Nom --Gtstricky (talk) 17:12, 28 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom, and the hits get even worse when Wikipedia and its mirrors are removed. I get 274 hits, and not even all of those are related, some are referring to the Sacagewea dollar and other unrelated things. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  18:40, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete due to problems with notability and verifiabity. Capitalistroadster (talk) 18:43, 28 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.