Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miller's Last Theorem


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete per WP:CSD and WP:SNOW. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:52, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Miller's Last Theorem
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Author asserts this is an original theory; OR. - Philippe 01:25, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
 * delete, Needs references or proof  being a non-original research --Rirunmot 01:40, 21 February 2010 (UTC)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rirunmot (talk • contribs)
 * Delete. Original research which is apparently meant as a joke, not an actual theorem. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:17, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong delete, not only original research, but also made up at school one day, and a complete joke by mathematical standards. It relies on human subjectivity! J I P  | Talk 06:31, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
 * SUPREME SPEEDY DELETE as nonsense. WP:IAR if we must, let us not waste any further time here.  Delete as it violates our policy against original research of this sort.   JBsupreme  ( talk ) 06:38, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: It's not actually OR at all, it's just a schoolboy prank -- Boing!   said Zebedee  06:51, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Actually it's just absurd humor. --George100 (talk) 11:46, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - G3, WP:MADEUP. --RrburkeekrubrR 15:05, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete I'm inclined to say that it's none of the above. Click on the link, track it to the advertisement for Milljo Software, Inc. Mandsford (talk) 15:28, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
 * There is no advertisement on the page it links to. All there is is a direct copy of the text of the article plus an illustrating picture. It's all equally worthless, but I don't see how it is advertising anything. J I P  | Talk 16:25, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The url us "http://milljosoftware.com/mlt.html" - if you remove the "/mlt.html" you get the company site. But having said that, I don't think this article is advertising, because the site looks defunct - copyright 2006 but still "under construction", with the images broken (and it's advertising web design!). -- Boing!   said Zebedee  16:42, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Super delete via WP:IAR per JBSupreme. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 18:06, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'm a card-carrying Inclusionist, but even I have my standards. If it's a Big Thing, it will be back, and armed a Citation Cannon. Ezratrumpet (talk) 02:38, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:SNOW Oh god, oh god, make the stupid stop... please... To anyone who "got" geometry or high-school algebra, it's obvious nonsense. Studerby (talk) 00:41, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as nonsense. -- Whpq (talk) 18:23, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.