Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Milli Deste


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 10:03, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Milli Deste

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A newly formed supporter's club, the article was created by one of the founders (link). No pages in the article name space link to this article. The subject matter appear to have no relevant Google hits except this article. In breach of WP:NN, WP:SPIP and WP:COI.] Thuresson (talk) 18:10, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 18:23, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Dear administrators,

This fan club will be announced on 1st of March and we will have many hits in Google. Please give us 3-4 days, and I will include all related hits/web-sites about this fan club under the citation paragraph. There is my interview to the local TV channel about this fan club.

Thank you for your consideration.

P.S: I am new to Wiki, so I tried to add this paragraph to this discussion, but undid my own article by mistake.--Shamil55 (talk) 18:40, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - As of now for no significant coverage and/or notability. Sounds like a case of WP:TOOSOON. We'll see if the subject is covered in 3-4 days. The AfD will still be open and at that point I'll revisit. Meatsgains (talk) 18:48, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - There are far too many issues with this article. The club hasn't even been officially created, and even when it has, it will still be far from meeting general notability. Add the self-promotion and conflict of interest concerns. I suggest to that they read all the relevant policies and guidelines before resubmitting this article. — Jkudlick • t • c • s 19:44, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment - I will also advise on their talk page that AfD templates cannot be removed until the discussion is closed. — Jkudlick • t • c • s 19:49, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. — Jkudlick • t • c • s 20:04, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Azerbaijan-related deletion discussions. — Jkudlick • t • c • s 20:05, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — Jkudlick • t • c • s 20:05, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Dear Administrators,

As I mentioned above, I removed the notice by mistake. Thanks for restoring it back. In 3-4 days, I will include all relevant coverage of our supporter group in different media sites. I agree with your point about self-promotion, however a lot of people are already aware of this group and after the opening of it on 1st of March, it will become more of an information page, rather than self-promotion.

If conflict of interest is related to my name, I can exclude that sentence without any problem. Thanks for pointing it out. --Shamil55 (talk) 20:36, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Addition: I have opened a case about my logo. But no one has replied yet. I wonder why the logo was removed from the web-site. You can check the removal in the history of the page. --Shamil55 (talk) 20:38, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment - That particular file was removed from Wikimedia Commons (which is a separate project from English Wikipedia) due to copyright issues, and is completely separate from the current discussion. You can read more about proper licensing on Commons at c:Commons:Licensing, and that project would be the proper venue to discuss the file. — Jkudlick • t • c • s 21:20, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of notability. GiantSnowman 21:39, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Thanks, Jkudlick. I do understand that it does not belong here, I just asked. Why are you all so aggressive? :) Thanks, GiantSnowman :) We know that there is no evidence of notability. I asked for 3-4 days to bring the evidence. --Shamil55 (talk) 21:44, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
 * I did not intend to be aggressive, so I apologize if I seem that way. I merely intended to point you in the correct directions. — Jkudlick • t • c • s 22:37, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

@Jkudlick, no worries. I probably misunderstood it. I e-mailed permission-commons(at)wikipedia.org about license and verification of logo. Anyways, going back to the article. I will post here all new info in 3-4 days. If it still violates any Wikipedia regulations, then you can delete it. Thank you very much for the constructive discussion. --Shamil55 (talk) 23:33, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - The fan club only launches tomorrow. I simply don't see how this could satisfy GNG at the moment, nor in the short term when any coverage is likely to be repeated comments along the lines of "new fan club launched" with little that could be used to generate encyclopedic comment. Could be notable in the future, but not now. Fenix down (talk) 15:56, 29 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment/Delete - Seems to be a case of WP:TOOSOON. Can be recreated in future when subject becomes notable. Inter&#38;anthro (talk) 15:57, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete or redirect to the team- WP:TOOSOON. Joseph2302 (talk) 21:17, 3 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.