Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Millionaire Manor


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to The National Lottery Draws. Insufficient sources. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 00:26, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Millionaire Manor

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

An unremarkable short-lived TV show. I found a one-paragraph comment in the Sunday Times, but nothing else of note. No lasting significance. Moswento talky 12:59, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable. -- Fauzan  ✆ talk   ✉ email  14:27, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:36, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:36, 17 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep It failed, but aired on a major network for a period of time (and here at least has ratings info to go with said failure); common outcome is that this should be kept.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 18:33, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Maybe, but a more common outcome is that articles that fail the general notability guidelines should be deleted. Notability (media) says: "Generally, an individual radio or television program is likely to be notable if it airs on a network of radio or television stations...with a national audience...In either case, however, the presence or absence of reliable sources is more definitive than the geographic range of the program's audience alone...a national television program may not be notable if it was cancelled too quickly to have garnered any significant media coverage." Can you find any significant media coverage for this? Moswento talky 19:44, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep It has some category and it can be refreshed. Miyole (talk) 16:47, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 00:13, 24 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete: no in-depth sources SPattalk 01:28, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment If it's judged not notable it should redirect to The National Lottery Draws, which includes basic information on this program. --Colapeninsula (talk) 13:05, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Tentative Delete - The short lived nature of it doesn't really bother me. I'd like to see more sources though. If those can be provided, I will change my vote to keep. Bali88 (talk) 15:59, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.