Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mills Music Mission


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to Phi Mu Alpha Sinfonia. EdJohnston (talk) 15:06, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Mills Music Mission

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The content of this orphaned article is mostly a duplicate of information already well covered in Phi Mu Alpha Sinfonia. Any content that isn't overlapping could be merged. Mister Senseless&trade; (Speak - Contributions) 19:15, 11 April 2008 (UTC) 
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 22:51, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom--SevernSevern (talk) 13:37, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, at best a brief mention in that other article. Punkmorten (talk) 21:12, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect &rarr; Phi_Mu_Alpha_Sinfonia and tag with Template:R to section. The article has no references; therefore, there is nothing verifiable to merge.  The treatment in the fraternity article is sufficient, sourced and provides context to the topic.  The fraternity article will need to be edited a bit to accommodate the redirect (i.e. de-linking the title in the target section and bolding the term); the infobox link can stay as is without revision, in my opinion. --User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 00:53, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment &mdash; considering the content of the nomination, the preferred option would have been to tag the article with Template:Mergeto rather than bringing it to WP:AFD ... or simply a bold action converting the article a redirect. --User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 00:55, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mister Senseless&trade; (Speak - Contributions) 20:10, 19 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Redirect per Ceyockey. I agree: this should have been done instead of taking the issue up in AfD. B.Wind (talk) 05:57, 25 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.