Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Milly Bloom


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to List of Ulysses characters. As merging is an editorial decision, the other stubs don't need to go through AfD (though you probably knew that). (non-admin closure) ansh 666 07:11, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Milly Bloom

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A minor character in James Joyce's novel "who does not actually appear in Ulysses". There are about 30-40 more minor characters listed in the template Ulysses that look like they should also go away. Clarityfiend (talk) 03:31, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Along with all the other minor character pages. Meatsgains (talk) 04:11, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete, or potentially redirect to the article about the novel (if there is a good reason for the article about the novel to mention her). Vanamonde93 (talk) 04:41, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  sst  ✈  05:23, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Merge along with other minor characters to List_of_Ulysses_characters. There is an exhaustive body of commentary on the novel, you could probably pull together a pretty reasonable collection of sources to salvage the article, if you wanted to See this Google Scholar search, but it seems much more reasonable to merge the materials. Sadads (talk) 06:40, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:53, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge to List of Ulysses characters. All the other minor stub character articles should be given the same treatment. Satellizer   (´ ･ ω ･ `)  11:13, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Simply Redirect as there's hardly any context to merge and this is quite unlikely better improvable. SwisterTwister   talk  03:39, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge - Other stubs should be merged as well. I will be happy to do that after the closure of this discussion.  Ya  sh  !   13:02, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
 * It looks like we are trending that way, a bold merge with removal of OR from those pages would help wrap this up, and provide us a good idea of what a merged list would look like. If you do the merge, I can come in behind and help you do some more referencing around the characters and/or a further reading section. I took a Ulysses class about 3-4 years ago, and have a pretty good handle on finding/working with the scholarship, to add something substantial about each of the characters. Sadads (talk) 15:15, 4 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.