Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Milly Kay


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 03:12, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Milly Kay

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The subject of this article fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. He has not received independent coverage in reliable Nigerian newspapers. The accolades he supposedly won are all unsourced. I wasn't able to find references to validate said accolades. The News Telegram and News Punch articles look almost identical. Both of the aforementioned references do not appear to be reliable. The News Telegram's About Us page doesn't show the newspaper having editorial oversight. News Punch describes itself as a promotional news portal.  Versace1608  Wanna Talk? 23:26, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   Versace1608   Wanna Talk? 23:27, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions.   Versace1608   Wanna Talk? 23:27, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions.   Versace1608   Wanna Talk? 23:27, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:55, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.   Versace1608   Wanna Talk? 15:59, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 18:04, 15 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - Independent news search only brought up blogs and music downloads and didn't reveal any sort of news or coverage that could be used to establish notability, and as such fails WP:MUSICBIO. Pishcal (talk) 18:10, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - That's wrong as per above delete. I understand Versace reasons, the article lack reliable source, which the editor said the references looks identical. As per above delete Notability also falls under WP:GNG that is why I decided to find reliable source, the subject article has been discussed on some Newspaper which deos not look identical Take a look at The Punch newspaper which does not look identical. As for WP: MUSICBIO the article needs more reference. The subject article has won awards which I saw on TV. It took me a lot of time to find out the realible source because it does not pop up when I search subject aetucle. I believe the article needs improvement because he has been discussed in Newspaper which I provided passes WP:GNG. I will suggest the Tag for Adding Reference should be inserted on this Page, their I can put my best in searching out more references to identify it's WP: MUSICBIO.--Bob276 (talk) 07:51, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Would you really consider that article "non-trivial"? Per WP:MUSICBIO, a subject is notable if they have "been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself." I don't think that article meets that criteria. Furthermore, reading News Punch's page, it says: "Contact us today for your news promotions.", revealing that the article may not be independent of the musician. Pishcal (talk) 23:50, 19 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete not enough non-trivial coverage to meet the inclusion guidelines for musicians.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:40, 20 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.