Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Milutin Dostanić (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:14, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

Milutin Dostanić
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article was deleted after an AfD in 2014 and recreated shortly after that. However, there still is no indication whatsoever that either WP:PROF or WP:GNG. GScholar indicates that his works have been cited a total of 382 times, highest counts 28, 26, and 25, with and h-index of 12, which even in a low-citation density field like mathematics does not appear to indicate notability. There is also an exhaustive bibliography at Milutin Dostanić bibliography, which I have PRODded. I note that most activity on these two articles occurred just after Dostanić passed away (WP:NOTMEMORIAL). In the absence of evidence of notability: delete. Randykitty (talk) 08:09, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Randykitty (talk) 08:09, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. Randykitty (talk) 08:09, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Yugoslavia-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:58, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:58, 25 May 2019 (UTC)


 * keep the article is well sourced and WP:PROF indicates notability: for a mathematician this is reasonably high rate of citation (it actually puts him in the top 120 cited researchers for his field of Operator Theory). No reason to delete. hroest 15:24, 25 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete. GS citation rate not enough to pass WP:Prof, even in pure mathematics. Xxanthippe (talk) 06:36, 26 May 2019 (UTC).
 * Delete. One popular-press obituary saying that he's important as a Serbian mathematician (with no evidence) isn't enough to convince me of a pass of WP:PROF, and there seems to be nothing else. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:45, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete In pure mathematics, I doubt that GS citation counts mean much one way or the other, but I'm not seeing any other grounds for wiki-notability, either. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 21:32, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note The aforementioned article's AFD is at Articles for deletion/Milutin Dostanić bibliography. FoxyGrampa75 (talk) 01:45, 28 May 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.