Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mimi Pond


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. John254 00:10, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Mimi Pond

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

The prod was removed with the rationale "I think that the fact that she wrote the first episode distinguishes her enough from other writers" but notability is not inherited. And by the way, she wrote the episode that aired first, not the very first episode, because Simpsons Roasting on an Open Fire was written to be in the mid season. She has only done one other thing, and in my mind she easily fails WP:BIO. Scorpion0422 12:01, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Looks like she has done more than one thing, and has been noted in reliable sources for them. Phil Bridger (talk) 12:12, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. She's done a few things as a cartoonist as well as a writer. . I'll add info to the article now. AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 12:14, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. I've updated the article with the rest of her work.--AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 12:37, 7 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep. Easily passes WP:BIO for her fairly popular 1980s books. --Dhartung | Talk 22:21, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.   —Lquilter (talk) 23:04, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:HEY, as notability is now clear. UltraExactZZ Claims~ Evidence 04:41, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Various accomplishment, while not earthshattering, seem to meet notability requirements and show a person that is not simply one dimensional in accomplishments. OneHappyHusky (talk) 05:58, 9 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.