Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mimi le duck


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep. Cbrown1023 00:08, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Mimi le duck


Procedural nomination. Neutral bump from speedy. —Quarl (talk) 2006-12-12 06:59Z 
 * Weak Keep if it can be cleaned up and wikified. It's a real show, with reviews, etc., easily retrievable. (I'm prepared to revise this opinion if someone can point me to notability guidelines for theatre and musicals, which I couldn't find. In their absence, I am forced to apply the Pokemon test.) - Eron Talk 16:37, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Week keep as well. Basically everything that was said just above is how I feel about it.
 * Weak keep per Eron.--John Lake 19:02, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete The article has no cited sources and therefore does not meet Verifiability and No Original Research. Two out of the three pillars of wikipedia, not met, I think constitutes deletion. Alan.ca 10:00, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.