Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mimicking Birds


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 05:29, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Mimicking Birds

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

I'm after the community's input on whether or not this band is notable. I have declined a speedy deletion request because the article asserts notability. Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 18:52, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment I find nothing to support meeting WP:BAND at allmusic or billboard. To me the question is twofold-- does their accompanyment of Modest Mouse on a US tour make them notable and do we have verifiable info that they made the tour? In one revision of the article is the information that their label is owned by the lead for Modest Mouse. Dloh cierekim  19:03, 24 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:29, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Hmm. Fairly easily found: Pitchfork album review, Spinner article, PopMatters album review, Paste magazine article, A.V. Club album review. Should be plenty, I think.--Michig (talk) 19:37, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Michig, but I was hoping for more. I suspect we'll not agree on the "significant coverage" interpretation. If anyone can save this, it's you. Cheers,  Dloh  cierekim  20:57, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete New band, fails all of WP:BAND and no notability by association with supporting more famous brethern. scope_creep (talk) 23:45, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. I've done what I can to improve the article, so perhaps people who have already commented could take another look? Personally, I think the coverage of the band is more than adequate to establish notability.--Michig (talk) 09:48, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep - I think it has more references than sentences now, but I'm not complaining. Good work. SteveStrummer (talk) 01:31, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per Michig's sources. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 05:21, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.