Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mimo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to MIMO. v/r - TP 22:36, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

Mimo

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I am creating this AfD on behalf of the IP who completed steps 1 and 3; rationale is copied from the talk page. I am neutral. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 20:45, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Why in the world does this page exist? I will be $1000 internet dollar that this whole thing was written by Marianne Murphy herself.   An "...aura of cuteness as well as a subtle touch of eeriness, further adding to its unique and mysterious personality"?????? Clearly MIMO should be the primary link. This page should almost certainly be deleted. 192.91.172.36 (talk) 19:11, 9 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Restore redirect to MIMO. Title has existed as a redirect or dab page since 2005. This article on the sock toys is blatant advertising, but there's too much history on the dab/redirect page that I don't think should be deleted. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 21:00, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for completing this step for me. I thought I had followed the correct order. 192.91.171.42 (talk) 12:37, 15 June 2011 (UTC) 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 16 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Restore redirect to MIMO, where the page cab still be useful. Current version is blatant spam. Edward321 (talk) 23:29, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.